NCUA Chairman Harper's Written Testimony to the Senate Banking Committee.

Samantha: Hello, this is Samantha Shares.

This episode covers N C U A Chairman
Todd Harper's Written Testimony

Before the Senate Banking, Housing,
and Urban Affairs Committee.

The following is an audio version
of that written testimony.

This podcast is educational
and is not legal advice.

We are sponsored by Credit Union
Exam Solutions Incorporated, whose

team has over two hundred and
Forty years of National Credit

Union Administration experience.

We assist our clients with N C
U A so they save time and money.

If you are worried about a recent,
upcoming or in process N C U A

examination, reach out to learn how they
can assist at Mark Treichel DOT COM.

Also check out our other podcast called
With Flying Colors where we provide tips

on how to achieve success with N C U A.

And now the testimony.

Chairman Brown, Ranking Member
Scott, and members of the committee,

thank you for inviting me to discuss
the work of the National Credit

Union Administration (N C U A).

The N C U A protects credit union
member-owners and the safety and soundness

of the credit union system by managing
risks to the National Credit Union Share

Insurance Fund (Share Insurance Fund).

In my testimony today, I will discuss the
state of the credit union system, recent

efforts by the agency to strengthen the
system, and four legislative requests.

State of the Credit Union System

Credit union performance during
Twenty-Twenty-Three was mixed due

to increased market competition
and rising interest rates.

Large, complex credit unions (those
with assets greater than five hundred

million dollars) posted a decline in
the aggregate return on average assets

stemming from deposit competition and
increased use of wholesale funding.

In contrast, credit unions with assets
less than or equal to five hundred

million dollars in assets have a more
stable deposit base, which mitigates

the cost of funding increases.

While these credit unions
generally experienced some deposit

decline, earnings remained stable.

Both groups increased net interest
margins by reacting to interest rate

movements to benefit from higher
yields on loans and investments.

In general, credit union liquidity
appears to be stable, but the N C U

A is seeing signs of stress linked to
the current interest rate environment.

This financial stress is reflected
in the increasing number of

credit unions with a composite
CAMELS code rating of 3, 4, and 5.

Assets in institutions with a composite
CAMELS 3 rating increased from December

2022 to December Twenty-Twenty-Three,
especially among large, complex

credit unions with greater than five
hundred million dollars in assets.

Credit unions with composite CAMELS
4 and 5 ratings remained relatively

stable during Twenty-Twenty-Three.

Year over year, credit unions
with a liquidity component

rating of three nearly doubled.

Just over three hundred credit
unions experienced a decline in

the liquidity component rating
from a 1 or 2 to a 3, 4, or 5.

Additionally, during Twenty-Twenty-Three,
the number of credit unions with a

high liquidity risk rating tripled.

Credit Union System Performance

As of December, thirty one,
Twenty-Twenty-Three, federally insured

credit unions’ aggregate net worth ratio
was 10 point 95 percent, an increase

of 17 basis points over the year.

There was continued year-over-year
growth in assets and lending, albeit

at a slower pace, with the credit
union system’s total assets surpassing

2 point 2 trillion dollars and total
loans outstanding reaching more

than 1 point 6 trillion dollars.

Insured shares and deposits increased
slightly during Twenty-Twenty-Three,

ending the year almost 1 point 7
percent higher than one year earlier.

The growing financial strain on credit
unions’ balance sheets and consumer

financial stress due to elevated interest
rates and economic uncertainty were

more noticeable in the fourth quarter.

The delinquency rate for total
loans and leases rose to 0 point

83 percent in the last quarter of
Twenty-Twenty-Three, the highest year-end

rate in the previous seven years.

The delinquency rate on credit cards
and automobile loans rapidly increased

during Twenty-Twenty-Three, ending
the year at 2 point eleven and 0

point nine percent, respectively.

It might be noted that the 2
point eleven percent rate for

credit cards was higher than rates
observed during the Great Recession.

Additionally, the aggregate net
charge-off rate on loans and leases

has risen over the last year,
climbing to 0-point 61 percent in the

fourth quarter, reaching its highest
point since June twenty-eighteen.

Funding costs for credit unions
have increased significantly in the

rising interest rate environment.

Credit unions have increased their
issuances of time deposits, leading

to total interest expenses growing
substantially over the year.

As a result, the industry’s return
on average assets has declined

over the prior year but remains
satisfactory at 0-point 69 percent.

Additionally, the industry doubled its
credit loss provision expense from 5 point

5 billion dollars in 2022 to 11 point 3
billion dollars in Twenty-Twenty-Three.

This shift was the combined result
of the final implementation of the

Current Expected Credit Loss accounting
methodology and rising expectations

of elevated problem loan levels.

Despite the loan deterioration over
the year, earnings, net worth, and

reserves for credit losses indicate
a resilient credit union industry.

External Factors Affecting the System

The N C U A is closely monitoring
the economic landscape that credit

unions and their member-owners face.

Elevated prices and interest
rates continue to negatively

affect some household budgets,
leading to a deterioration in loan

performance and rising credit risk.

In addition, the prevalence of hybrid
work environments continues to strain

commercial real estate lending.

Overall, the credit union system
has modest exposure to this type

of lending; however, the N C U A is
tracking specific credit unions with

material exposure to such loans.

Elevated interest rates and the
challenging shape of the yield curve

continue to present liquidity and
interest rate risks in the credit union

system, including at several of the
four hundred and thirty two federally

insured credit unions with more
than one billion dollars in assets.

Accordingly, the N C U A has emphasized
the importance of liquidity risk

management and contingency planning
in its industry communications.

The agency will continue to ensure
credit unions conduct liquidity

and asset-liability management
planning to address current

challenges and future uncertainties.

To mitigate potential risks and safeguard
the Share Insurance Fund against

possible losses, the N C U A will also
remain vigilant in monitoring credit

union performance through examinations,
offsite monitoring, and supervision.

Additionally, the N C U A will
take necessary action to protect

credit union member-owners and
their deposits whenever required.

Artificial intelligence (A
I), like every new technology,

offers both promise and peril.

The N C U A ’s goal is to maximize and
deliver on the former while identifying

and mitigating the risks of the latter.

Consistent with the Executive Order
on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy

Development and Use of Artificial
Intelligence, the N C U A is in the early

stages of researching, assessing, and
developing plans to address opportunities

and risks associated with AI tools.

In Twenty-Twenty-Three, the N C U A
issued guidance reminding credit unions

of their obligation to comply with
the Equal Credit Opportunity Act’s

nondiscrimination requirements in
using automated underwriting systems.

The N C U A also joined other federal
financial regulators to issue a proposed

rule about automated valuation models
incorporating fair lending principles.

While AI allows credit unions to
automate certain functions like member

communication, fraud detection, and
loan underwriting, it must be used

to ensure fairness, transparency,
privacy, and consumer protection.

Share Insurance Fund Performance

Backed by the full faith and credit
of the United States, the Share

Insurance Fund provides insurance
coverage for individual accounts at

federally insured credit unions of up
to TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS.

As of December thirty one,
Twenty-Twenty-Three, the Share

Insurance Fund insured 1 POINT 7
trillion DOLLARS in share deposits.

Notably, the Share Insurance Fund protects
nearly 91.4 percent of total share

deposits in the credit union system.

In comparison, uninsured shares
and deposits equaled nearly

161 POINT 4 billion DOLLARS at
year-end Twenty-Twenty-Three or 8.6

percent of total share deposits.

The Share Insurance Fund
continues to perform well, with

no premiums currently expected.

As of December thirty one,
Twenty-Twenty-Three, the Share Insurance

Fund reported a year-to-date net income
of TWO HUNDRED AND NINE MILLION DOLLARS,

a net position of TWENTY ONE POINT TWO
billion DOLLARS, and an equity ratio of 1

POINT 30 percent, which is sufficient but
below the 1.33 percent normal operating

level target set by the N C U A Board.

Given the liquidity events in
Twenty-Twenty-Three, economic

conditions, and the growing stress in
the credit union system from liquidity

and interest rate risks, the N C U A
Board decided to build up the Share

Insurance Fund’s liquidity position.

The current overnight balance is
FIVE POINT SIX billion DOLLARS.

The N C U A Board continues to monitor
liquidity in the Share Insurance Fund.

State of the Central Liquidity Facility

Inflationary pressures, elevated
interest rates, and liquidity risk all

underscore the importance of the N C U
A ’s Central Liquidity Facility (C L F).

The C L F is an important tool
that acts as a shock absorber when

unexpected liquidity events occur.

Under the N C U A ’s regulations,
federally insured credit unions with

assets of TWO HUNDRED FIFTY million
DOLLARS or more must establish and

document access to at least one
contingent federal liquidity source

for emergency liquidity as part of
their contingency funding plans.

This federal emergency liquidity
backstop can be the C L F, the Federal

Reserve’s Discount Window, or both.

Credit unions with less than TWO
HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS in assets

are not required to have membership
with a contingent federal liquidity

source; however, they must identify
external sources as part of their

liquidity policy or provide a written
contingency funding plan that is

commensurate with their complexity,
risk profile, and scope of operations.7

As of December thirty one,
Twenty-Twenty-Three, the C L F had four

hundred and seven consumer credit union
members, providing twenty point two

billion dollars in lending capacity.

These credit unions range in asset size
from less than fifty million dollars

to more than ten billion dollars.

The C L F helps protect approximately
three hundred seventy billion

dollars in credit union assets.

The more members the C L F has, the more
effective it is as a liquidity facility.

In December twenty twenty-two, the C L
F had a much greater total membership

of three thousand six hundred and
seventy-three consumer credit unions

with a combined five hundred thirty
seven billion dollars in member assets

and a lending capacity of twenty
seven point five billion dollars.

This rapid decline in membership
followed the expiration of the temporary

statutory enhancements that provided
greater flexibility and affordability

to corporate credit unions to serve as
agent members of the C L F to cover their

smaller credit union members, and that:

• Increased the C L F’s maximum
legal borrowing authority;

• Permitted access for corporate
credit unions, as agent members,

to borrow for their own needs; and

• Gave the N C U A Board the clarity and
flexibility about the loans it could

approve by removing the phrase, “the
Board shall not approve an application

for credit the intent of which is
to expand credit union portfolios.”

These enhancements expired on January
1, Twenty-Twenty-Three, resulting in

three thousand three hundred and twenty
two credit unions with less than two

hundred and fifty million dollars in
assets losing access to the C L F.

To address this expiration and growing
liquidity risks, the N C U A Board has

unanimously requested that Congress allow
corporate credit unions the flexibility

to purchase capital stock in the C L
F for a subset of their members, to

provide their smaller credit union
members with access to the facility.

The Congressional Budget Office
has scored this and the other C L

F reforms at no cost to taxpayers.

N C U A ’s Efforts to Protect and
Strengthen the Credit Union System

In the past few months, the N C U A has
taken actions to respond to cybersecurity

risk; enhance consumer financial
protection; support minority depository

institutions; improve the credit union
systems and the N C U A ’s diversity,

equity, inclusion, and accessibility
efforts; and has considered rulemaking

activities that strengthen the system.

Enhancing Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity threats within the
financial services industry are

high and expected to remain so.

To maintain vigilance against
these threats, the N C U

A is ensuring consistency,
transparency, and accountability

in its cybersecurity examination
program and related activities.

The N C U A ’s recently implemented cyber
incident reporting rule has proven helpful

to the agency and credit union industry.

The final rule requires a federally
insured credit union to report a

substantial cyber incident to the
N C U A as soon as possible but no

later than seventy-two hours after
the credit union reasonably believes a

reportable cyber incident has occurred.

In the first thirty days after the
rule became effective, the N C U A

received one hundred and forty-six
total incident reports, exceeding all

previous reporting from the prior year.

As of March, twenty twenty four,
the total number of incident

reports is just under one thousand.

The data collected has significantly
improved our capacity to identify

trends, vulnerabilities, and
potential risks that could affect

the entire sector’s cybersecurity.

This, in turn, has allowed us
to develop strategies to enhance

cyber resilience across the board.

Moreover, this information will help
us to evaluate the effectiveness

of current cybersecurity practices
among credit unions, leading to more

informed regulatory guidance and better
mitigation of future cyber risks.

More than 70 percent of these
incident reports involve third-party

providers and credit union
service organizations (CUSOs).

The N C U A also actively communicates
with credit unions about the

increased likelihood of cyberattacks
resulting from geopolitical

tensions and other cyber events.

Credit unions of all
sizes are a part of U.

S.

critical infrastructure and will likely
remain consistent targets for certain

criminals, as well as our nation’s
most capable foreign adversaries, and

as such, should implement appropriate
controls in the technology they

use to deliver member services.

Maintaining Consumer Financial Protection

An essential part of the N C U A ’s
mission is to examine credit unions with

ten billion dollars or less in assets
for compliance with consumer financial

protection laws and regulations.

The agency’s consumer compliance efforts
are integral to ensuring the credit

union system remains safe and sound.

In Twenty-twenty-four, the agency’s
consumer financial protection supervisory

priorities include overdraft programs,
fair lending, and automobile lending,

including assessing compliance with Truth
in Lending Act requirements and reviewing

credit unions’ practices related to
Guaranteed Asset Protection Insurance.

This year, the N C U A is also focusing
on credit union compliance with

the Flood Disaster Protection Act,
including its disclosure requirements.

In addition, the agency continues to
review credit union overdraft programs

and non-sufficient funds fee practices.

Credit union member-owners and the
public should have clear visibility

into the income a credit union generates
from overdraft and non-sufficient funds

fees charged to its member-owners.

Therefore, beginning with the
Twenty-twenty-four first quarter

Call Report, the N C U A required
federally insured credit unions with

more than 1 billion dollars in assets
to disclose, separately, income from

overdraft and non-sufficient funds fees.

These Call Report changes will
allow credit unions to benchmark

their overdraft programs against
other financial institutions.

The N C U A ’s supervision of these
services aims to create a more equitable

system that supports financial stability
for credit union members, improves

transparency, and advances the statutory
mission of credit unions to meet the

credit and savings needs of their
members, especially those of modest means.

Furthermore, the N C U A is
conducting targeted fair lending

examinations at federal credit unions
to assess compliance with federal

fair lending laws and regulations.

These reviews are critical to identifying
discrimination and economic equity.

In the fair lending examinations
conducted in Twenty-Twenty-Three, the

N C U A identified pattern or practice
of discrimination violations, illegal

redlining, indirect lending pricing
concerns, systemic Home Mortgage

Disclosure Act violations, Regulation B
notification and government monitoring

information violations, and numerous
instances of inadequate fair lending

compliance management systems.

In Twenty-Twenty-Three, the N C U
A referred six credit unions to the

Department of Justice for discrimination
based on age or marital status.

These referrals impacted over fifty-five
thousand consumers, and associated

remediation expenses exceeded five
hundred and seventy-five thousand dollars.

In February, the N C U A joined the
other Federal Financial Institution

Examination Council agencies to issue
a statement of examination principles

related to valuation discrimination and
bias in residential real estate lending.

The principles will assess whether
credit unions’ compliance and risk

management practices are sufficient to
identify and mitigate discrimination

or bias in their residential
real estate valuation practices.

As part of its consumer financial
protection efforts, the N C U A ’s

Consumer Assistance Center resolves
consumer complaints against federal

credit unions with total assets of
ten billion dollars or less and, in

certain instances, federally insured,
state-chartered credit unions.

In Twenty-Twenty-Three, the Consumer
Assistance Center responded to 12,276

written complaints, 884 inquiries,
35,098 telephone calls, and recovered

over one point one million dollars in
monetary benefits for complaints from

consumers and credit unions concerning
consumer financial protection regulations.

Finally, the N C U A regularly
offers webinars promoting financial

education and economic equity.

Over the past year, the agency has
hosted webinars on cybersecurity and

identity protection, the IRS’s Volunteer
Income Tax Assistance program, appraisal

bias, elder financial exploitation,
and closing the racial wealth gap

and increasing financial equity.

The N C U A also released the Money
Basics Guides, a series of learning

tools developed to assist financial
educators, credit unions, and other

financial institutions with promoting
financial literacy in their communities.

The guides are also designed to
provide consumers with practical

skills to manage their money and
increase their financial capability.

The series includes guides on draft and
share accounts, saving and budgeting,

and building and maintaining credit.

Lastly, the agency participates in
national financial literacy initiatives,

including the interagency Financial
Literacy and Education Commission.

Supporting Minority
Depository Institutions

Minority depository institutions (M D I’s)
play a crucial role in providing safe,

fair and affordable financial services
to people with modest means, especially

minority individuals and communities
that have traditionally been underserved

by the financial services system.

At the end of the fourth quarter of
Twenty-Twenty-Three, there were 492

M D I credit unions—about one in
ten of all federally insured credit

unions—serving more than 6.5 million
members and holding assets of more

than eighty eight billion dollars.

Although M D I’s are typically smaller
institutions, with average assets of

approximately 181 million dollars, they
are solid performers with a return on

average assets, net worth ratio, and
net interest margin comparable to or

exceeding those of credit unions overall.

The N C U A ’s M D I Preservation
Program, in place since twenty

fifteen, assists in cultivating
and sustaining existing M D I’S.

In 2022, the N C U A launched the Small
Credit Union and M D I Support Program to

help M D I’S with operational challenges
such as staff training, examination

concerns, and earnings improvement.

For Twenty-twenty-four, the N C U A is
allocating four thousand six hundred staff

hours across its three regional offices
to support and consult with M D I’S.

In the Twenty-Twenty-Three grant round,
42 M D I’s received over 1.4 million

dollars in technical assistance grants, a
five-fold increase from the previous year.

Earlier that year, Congress authorized
all M D I’s to be eligible for

Community Development Revolving
Loan Fund grants and loans.

Prior to Twenty-Twenty-Three, M
D I’s had to meet the low-income

credit union designation to qualify.

This authorization was not extended in the
recent appropriation, and I respectfully

request that lawmakers reinstate C
D R L F eligibility for all M D I’s.

M D I’s are very small credit unions
with average assets of 180 million

dollars and, in many circumstances, are
supported by unpaid volunteer staff.

Due to limited resources, C D R L F
grants assist M D I’S in remaining

competitive by starting a new product
or service such as ATMs, online

banking, and other products consumers
expect from a financial institution.

In addition, the N C U A hosted an M D I
Awareness Month in Twenty-Twenty-Three to

showcase the work of these credit unions.

Similar efforts will continue
in Twenty-twenty-four.

In October, the agency hosted an
M D I Symposium that discussed

how it could better serve M D I’S,
and the N C U A plans to hold a

similar event again this year.

The N C U A intends to use information
from this outreach to further improve

its M D I Preservation Program.

Advancing Diversity, Equity,
Inclusion, and Accessibility

The N C U A is fully committed to
fostering diversity, equity, inclusion,

and accessibility (D E I A) within the
agency and the credit union system.

Through external initiatives like the
agency’s DEI Summit and internal efforts

like employee resource groups, outreach
to potential diverse suppliers, and hiring

initiatives to promote a diverse pipeline
of applicants, the N C U A advances

important D E I A principles within the
agency and across the credit union system.

These efforts are outlined in the N C
U A ’s Diversity, Equity, Inclusion,

and Accessibility Strategic Plan
Twenty-twenty-four TO TWENTY TWENTY

SIX, released earlier this year.

The four strategic goals in this plan
will guide the N C U A ’s efforts

and reinforce its commitment to D E
I A as a business imperative for the

agency and the credit union industry.

In doing so, the agency and the
broader credit union community will

be well-positioned for significant,
long-term, and sustainable progress.

As shown in the agency’s Federal
Employee Viewpoint Survey results, the

N C U A draws strength from a broad
range of talents and perspectives.

The agency uses data from the U.S.

Office of Personnel Management’s
Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey,

including the Diversity, Equity,
Inclusion, and Accessibility

Index, to inform its data-driven
D E I A strategies and activities.

In Twenty-Twenty-Three, the D E I A
index revealed that 77 percent of N C U A

respondents reported positive perceptions
of agency practices related to D E I A.

The government-wide D E I A
index average was 72 percent

and 76 percent for medium-sized
agencies in Twenty-Twenty-Three.

The N C U A also supports workforce
diversity, equity, inclusion,

and accessibility through its
training, outreach and recruitment,

special emphasis programs, and
employee resource groups (E R G).

During fiscal year Twenty-Twenty-Three,
E R G’s expanded their presence in

the N C U A community—41 POINT 4
percent of N C U A employees are

members of E R G’s, putting the N C
U A well above the industry-standard

E R G membership goal of 10 percent
of an organization’s total workforce.

In addition, the N C U A routinely
recruits employees with diverse

backgrounds and seeks to ensure
broad applicant pools for vacancies.

These diversity recruitment
efforts aim to attract and retain

highly qualified individuals from
historically underrepresented groups.

The agency continues to build a pipeline
of diverse talent in attracting, hiring,

and retaining a diverse workforce.

Since TWENTY SEVENTEEN, the N C U A
has consistently exceeded the federal

employment rate goals for employees
with disabilities and employees with

targeted disabilities, with 17 POINT
0 percent of individuals reporting

disabilities and 4 POINT 7 percent
reporting targeted disabilities.

The N C U A supports accessibility
through its hiring efforts,

reasonable accommodations program,
Disability Solutions Desk, and

Section 508 compliance program.

In GSA’s Twenty-Twenty-Three report
to Congress on compliance with Section

508 of the Rehabilitation Act of
NINETEEN SEVENTY THREE, the N C U

A had a maturity level of Moderate
and a conformance level of Very High.

In Twenty-twenty-four, training,
human capital, culture, and

leadership will be the agency’s
focus areas for further improvement

in its compliance with Section 508.

The N C U A continues to build a
diverse supplier network to obtain

innovative solutions and the best
value, particularly in technology

and information technology solutions.

The agency is committed to supporting
minority- and women-owned businesses

through our supplier diversity program.

Diverse suppliers and vendors play
a vital role in the economic success

of small businesses and diverse
communities, and in the success of

the N C U A , by bringing in new
perspectives and delivering innovation.

By fiscal year-end Twenty-Twenty-Three,
the agency awarded 47 POINT 5 percent

of reportable contract dollars to
minority- or women-owned businesses.

This performance represents a strong,
sustained showing for the N C U A and

places it among the top performers among
federal financial regulatory agencies.

The N C U A also provides credit
unions with a diversity self-assessment

tool to help measure their progress
in applying D E I A principles.

Credit unions may assess their D E
I A policies and programs through

this voluntary credit union diversity
self-assessment offered annually.

Credit union voluntary self-assessments
have no bearing on CAMELS rating and

examiners cannot access the data.

The N C U A reports credit union
diversity data only in the aggregate.

The agency encourages credit unions to
use this tool to support and evaluate

their D E I A efforts and benchmark
themselves with peer institutions.

Credit unions can use the
self-assessment to establish a baseline

for action, such as committing to
develop new products and services

to address the needs of communities
of color, increasing investment in

underserved areas, and improving
community marketing and outreach.

Finally, from July 9-11, the
N C U A will host its annual

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Summit in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

This event provides a forum for
hundreds of stakeholders to attend

workshops, network, share best
practices, and meet with leaders

on ways to expand D E I A efforts.

Rulemaking Activities

In November, the N C U A Board unanimously
approved a final rule that adds

“war veterans’ organizations” to the
definition of a “qualified charity” that

a federal credit union may contribute
to using a charitable donation account.

Specifically, the final rule adds a post
or organization of past or present members

of the Armed Forces of the United States,
or an auxiliary unit or society of, or

a trust or foundation for, any such post
or organization recognized as exempt

from taxation under section 501(c)(19)
of the Internal Revenue Code to the

definition of a “qualified charity” that
a federal credit union may contribute

to using a charitable donation account.

With this final rule, the N C U A
took an important step in honoring

our nation’s many veterans.

In March of this year, the N C U
A Board finalized updates to the

Interpretive Ruling and Policy
Statement that governs the agency’s

Minority Depository Institution (M D I)
Preservation Program for credit unions.

M D I’S play an important and unique role
in promoting the economic viability of

minority and underserved communities.

Through its M D I Preservation
Program, the N C U A engages in

a range of efforts to preserve M
D I’S and foster their success.

The M D I Preservation Program is
designed to comply with section 308

of the Financial Institutions Reform,
Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989.

The updates included incorporating
recent program initiatives, referencing

examiner guidance, explaining how the N
C U A will review an M D I’s designation

status during routine evaluations, and
adding new subsections on engagement,

technical assistance, M D I examinations,
Community Development Revolving Loan

Fund grants and loans, training and
education, and M D I preservation.

These changes to the structure and
current administration of the M D I

Program will better enable hundreds
of M D I credit unions to meet the

needs of their members and communities.

In addition, the N C U A has begun
plans to review credit union records

preservation requirements to understand
how the agency can update its records

preservation program regulations
and accompanying guidelines.

The N C U A will also be considering
a rulemaking to address succession

planning in federal credit unions.

Legislative Requests

Certain amendments to the Federal
Credit Union Act would allow

the N C U A to do its job more
effectively and safeguard credit union

member-owners, the Share Insurance
Fund, and ultimately the taxpayers

who back the Share Insurance Fund.

Restoration of Third-Party
Vendor Examination Authority

The N C U A ’s lack of third-party vendor
examination authority is a regulatory

blind spot that must be addressed.

Unlike the federal prudential banking
regulators, the N C U A lacks the

authority to examine credit union
third-party vendors and CUSOs.

Yet, the risks associated with credit
union reliance on third-party services

are expanding, increasing the potential
for losses to the Share Insurance Fund.

The absence of third-party vendor
examination authority limits

the N C U A ’s ability to assess
and mitigate potential risks

associated with these vendors.

Vendors typically decline requests
or refuse to implement recommended

actions, exacerbating credit unions’
exposure to operational, cybersecurity,

and compliance risks that can
arise from these relationships.

Without the authority to supervise
and enforce corrective actions and

visibility into these entities, the
N C U A cannot effectively protect

credit unions and their member-owners.

This regulatory blind spot has already
had a negative impact on the industry.

Between 2008 and 2015, nine CUSOs
contributed to material losses to the

Share Insurance Fund, causing losses in
24 credit unions, some of which failed.

According to N C U A staff calculations,
at least 73 credit unions incurred

losses between TWO THOUSAND AND
SEVEN and TWENTY-TWENTY as losses

at CUSOs rolled onto credit union
ledgers and led to liquidations.

And, last years’ third-party core
service provider disruption affecting

60 credit unions illuminated the N
C U A ’s challenges as it tried to

mitigate issues on behalf of impacted
credit unions and their member-owners.

Independent entities such as the
Government Accountability Office, the

Financial Stability Oversight Council,
and the N C U A ’s Office of Inspector

General have identified this deficiency
as a significant obstacle to the N

C U A ’s mission to safeguard credit
union members and the financial system.

All of them have recommended that Congress
provide the N C U A with this authority.

Moreover, this lack of vendor authority
also impacts the nation’s critical

economic infrastructure and national
security, as the interconnectedness of

financial services expands with other
industries and national infrastructure,

making any exposure potentially perilous.

Currently, one in three Americans use
a credit union for basic financial

services, and there are many credit
unions with fields of membership that

are tied to high-risk populations
such as congressional staff, the U.S.

military, the State Department,
and members of the U.S.

Intelligence Community.

Many of these credit unions utilize
third-party service providers to

provide critical member services and
a sophisticated cyberattack against a

vendor can have measurable impacts on the
personnel who are critical to government

operations and national security.

By current estimates, roughly 90
percent (or approximately ONE POINT NINE

Trillion DOLLARS) of industry assets
are in some way touched or managed by

unregulated third-party service providers.

If Congress grants the N C U A
examination authority over credit

union third-party vendors, risks
would be considerably mitigated.

Furthermore, credit unions would
have access to N C U A examination

summaries when conducting their own
due diligence of vendors and there

would be fewer requests from the N
C U A to credit unions to intervene

with vendors experiencing problems.

If granted this authority, the N C U A
would implement a risk-based examination

program focusing on services that relate
to safety and soundness, information

security, cybersecurity, the Bank
Secrecy Act and Anti-Money Laundering Act

compliance, consumer financial protection,
and areas posing significant financial

risk for the Share Insurance Fund.

Central Liquidity Facility Reforms

The N C U A Board, as noted earlier,
has unanimously supported a proposed

statutory change that would restore the
ability of corporate credit unions to

serve as C L F agents on behalf of a
subset of their member credit unions.

In the first session of the 118th
Congress, lawmakers introduced a

bipartisan bill allowing corporate credit
unions to buy C L F capital stock on

behalf of a subset of their members.

This bill enables corporate credit
unions to contribute capital to provide

coverage for smaller members with
assets under 250 million DOLLARS.

As liquidity risks within the
credit union system continue to

rise, prompt consideration of this
bill would help protect the system

from future liquidity events.

Additional Flexibility for
Administering the Share Insurance Fund

Liquidity risks within the credit union
system and rising interest rate risk

highlight N C U A ’s need for flexibility.

Therefore, N C U A urges Congress
to amend the Federal Credit Union

Act to remove limitations on the
Share Insurance Fund’s equity ratio

and ability to assess premiums.

This would provide parity with the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

and enable better fund management.

Specifically, amendments should remove the
limitations on assessing Share Insurance

Fund premiums when the equity ratio of the
fund is equal to or greater than 1 POINT

30 percent and if the premium charged
exceeds the amount necessary to restore

the equity ratio to 1 POINT 30 percent.

Further, a statutory change should remove
the 1 POINT 5 percent ceiling for the

Share Insurance Fund’s equity ratio
from the current statutory definition of

“normal operating level,” which limits
the Board’s ability to establish a higher

normal operating level for the fund.

This approach would prevent credit
unions from impairing their one percent

contributed capital deposit or paying
premiums during times of economic stress.

Additionally, these amendments would
enable the N C U A Board to proactively

manage the Share Insurance Fund using
a counter-cyclical approach, creating

reserves during economic upswings
and ensuring sufficient funds are

available throughout economic downturns.

Increase Grant Assistance for the
Community Development Revolving Loan Fund

Congress created the C D R L F
program to stimulate economic

development in low-income
communities served by credit unions.

Through its stewardship of the C D R L
F, the N C U A makes technical assistance

grants to eligible credit unions for
a variety of initiatives, including,

but not limited to, expanding outreach
to underserved populations, improving

digital services and cybersecurity, staff
training, and capacity-building programs.

The N C U A requests Congress increase
the appropriation for this vital program.

Although relatively small in size,
these grants make a big difference to

low-income and minority credit unions
working to provide more and better

services to their members and communities.

The N C U A does not use appropriated
funds to administer the C D R L F program.

Conclusion

The N C U A is prepared to
manage the effects of the credit

union system’s ever-changing
economic and business landscape.

The agency will continuously monitor
credit union performance and collaborate

with other federal financial institution
regulators to ensure the stability and

resilience of our nation’s financial
services system and economy and to

ensure that consumers are protected.

This concludes the N C U A Chairman
Todd Harper's Written Testimony

Before the Senate Banking, Housing,
and Urban Affairs Committee

If your Credit union could use assistance
with your exam, reach out to Mark Treichel

on LinkedIn, or at mark Treichel dot com.

This is Samantha Shares and
we Thank you for listening.

NCUA Chairman Harper's Written Testimony to the Senate Banking Committee.
Broadcast by